Office for Budget Responsibility’s report following the Spring Statement<\/a>. However, the government\u2019s manifesto pledge remains at 1.5m new homes. Where did the original number come from?<\/p>\nTo put it into perspective, 1.5m homes by 2029\u201330 means delivering around 300,000 homes per year in England alone \u2013 1.3m would equate to 260,000. It\u2019s ambitious \u2013 and arguably arbitrary. Has the government taken a page from Yamasa Toki\u2019s book, pulling numbers from the same source as the infamous 10,000 steps a day? What started as a marketing slogan is now a universally accepted benchmark \u2013 but that doesn\u2019t make it evidence-based.<\/p>\n
There\u2019s little publicly available data to show how this figure was calculated, and no clear empirical foundation to back it up. 300,000 new homes was originally set out as a recommendation by Dame Kate Barker in The 2004 Barker Review of Housing Supply. However, in her follow-up report, the Beyond Barker published in April 2024, Dame Kate said: \u201cThe prospect of 300,000 new homes a year seems as far off today as it did in 2004.\u201d Still, bold targets can be useful to kick-start reform and grab headlines \u2013 even if reality is already lagging behind. Instead of 10,000 steps, benefits accrue at 7,000 with the new fashion comprising even fewer steps with 30-minute interval walking.<\/p>\n
A wobbly start or steady foundations?<\/h3>\n Change is never easy \u2013 especially when you\u2019re trying to fix a system as entrenched and clunky as planning. Labour deserves credit for taking on a challenge that\u2019s been ducked by successive governments. They\u2019ve shown real commitment to reshaping the planning process, starting with its messy methodology \u2013 but progress will take time.<\/p>\n
This isn\u2019t a quick fix. Labour is opting for long-term, systemic reform \u2013 and meaningful change comes slowly. Consultation, legislative changes and structural overhauls rarely result in overnight success. It\u2019s no surprise, then, some estimates put the number of which will have been delivered come the first anniversary of Labour in power at around 215,000.<\/p>\n
But some early wins can\u2019t be ignored. Barriers have been removed, processes are being simplified and the foundations for future delivery are being laid. If the next four or five years go to plan, things should start to accelerate \u2013 and Labour\u2019s proposed 12 new towns (\u201cwell-designed beautiful communities\u201d) for England could play a key role.<\/p>\n
Planning reform: is the overhaul working?<\/h3>\n Changes to the National Planning Policy Framework (NPPF) and the introduction of the Planning and Infrastructure Bill represent, arguably, the most meaningful overhaul of planning in decades.<\/p>\n
Key changes include the introduction of grey belt development, affordable housing reforms, updates to Compulsory Purchase Orders (CPOs), a shake-up of planning committees and, crucially, the reinstatement of mandatory housing targets.<\/p>\n
The grey belt policy allows certain low-quality green belt land \u2013 defined as \u201cland in the Green Belt comprising previously developed land and\/or any other land that, in either case, does not strongly contribute to any of purposes (a), (b) and (d) in paragraph 143 of the NPPF.\u201d Land on the edge of existing roads or settlements may fall under this new category, but the final decision lies with local councils. If implemented properly, this could reduce pressure on protected green belt areas and unlock thousands of new homes.<\/p>\n\u00a9GOV UK<\/figcaption><\/figure>\nAffordable housing has also seen a shift. Developers building on grey belt land will be required to deliver 15% more affordable housing than the local baseline \u2013 so if policy requires 30%, developers must hit 45%. And half of all homes built on any green belt land must now be affordable.<\/p>\n
The revamped Affordable Homes Programme \u2013 backed by an \u00a311.5bn budget \u2013 also aims to deliver tens of thousands of new homes by 2026. This sits alongside the NPPF\u2019s removal of minimum requirements for First Homes, offering more flexibility and making it easier for developers to deliver social rent. Higher percentages of social rent are also being supported by the NPPF, bringing policy closer in line with actual need.<\/p>\n
On that note, the quiet axing of a compulsory minimum of First Homes from the NPPF is a welcome move. Councils previously struggled to agree on whether they counted toward affordable housing quotas, which created inconsistency and confusion.<\/p>\n\u00a9GOV UK<\/figcaption><\/figure>\nLabour has also reinstated mandatory housing targets, replacing previously advisory figures. These targets now carry legal weight, alongside a revised standard method for calculating housing need. The method aims to remove arbitrary caps and base delivery on a percentage of existing housing levels \u2013 a more proportionate and arguably fairer approach. Whether this will be properly enforced remains to be seen.<\/p>\n
A recent publication, Speeding Up Build Out (along with the government\u2019s accompanying technical consultation), as its title hints at, sets out measures to speed up the build out process. A key tenet of this publication is the Transparency and Accountability Measures provided for in the Levelling Up and Regeneration Act 2023. The build out framework will include measures such as the issuing of completion notices to developers who have stalled on building out and the issuing of what is termed a \u201cdelayed homes penalty\u201d. Developers will agree a build out timetable with the LPA and in the event the developer falls \u201csubstantially behind\u201d the agreed build out schedule, i.e. by 10% or more, they will be required to pay this penalty.<\/p>\n
Planning committees are also getting a refresh, with a focus on standardisation, training and streamlining. Smaller, more targeted committees could lead to more professional decision-making and fewer delays \u2013 and perhaps even push back on \u2018NIMBY-ism\u2019.<\/p>\n
But not all reforms have been welcomed. Environmental concerns have been raised around the Planning and Infrastructure Bill \u2013 specifically, how developers meet their ecological obligations. Part three of the bill focuses on \u2018development and nature recovery\u2019 and introduces a new \u2018Nature Restoration Fund\u2019.<\/p>\n
Rather than handling environmental protections themselves, developers can now pay into the fund as a form of compensation, potentially releasing them from certain duties around protected sites or species. Labour has called this a \u201cwin-win\u201d \u2013 but is it really? Or does it risk letting developers buy their way out of environmental responsibility with a fraction of their profit margins?<\/p>\n
Whether this turns into a progressive solution or a loophole depends on how it\u2019s managed \u2013 and how seriously developers take their environmental duties.<\/p>\n
Biodiversity Net Gain: Noble idea or easy cut?<\/h3>\n Biodiversity Net Gain (BNG) isn\u2019t going anywhere \u2013 on 28 May 2025, the government opened its consultation on BNG applying to Nationally Significant Infrastructure Projects from May 2026 \u2013 but it is vulnerable. It is one of the few areas where the government may be tempted to trim obligations if housebuilding rates falter. Developers already face multiple financial pressures, from education and highways to wider community infrastructure. If things get tight, BNG might be seen as expendable although it is enshrined in legislation and, so would require further legislative changes.<\/p>\n
There\u2019s a growing sense that, while BNG is well-intentioned, it could fall behind other priorities like schools or NHS capacity. The scheme\u2019s effectiveness may also be diluted by a shift away from meaningful local offsetting towards the centralised funding pots mentioned earlier. The BNG metric is, in essence, quantitative meaning that certain habitats score more highly than others, even where a habitat may not be the most suitable for the local environment. Further, even with a \u201cdiscount\u201d for more localised provision of BNG, developers may buy land elsewhere \u2013 such as the north of England, for example \u2013 where the cost of land is that much cheaper that, even with the BNG metric\u2019s \u201cpenalty\u201d, it still makes economic sense. However, such a scenario, surely, defeats the purpose of the BNG rules.<\/p>\n
A breeding ground for case law<\/h3>\n From a legal perspective, this is where things get interesting and busier. The reforms will need careful navigation, especially as local authorities and developers work through what the new policies mean in practice.<\/p>\n
There\u2019s always a risk that progress is slowed not by the reforms themselves, but by the arguments they provoke. Legal clarity takes time, and in the meantime, some projects may stall while definitions and requirements are tested in court.<\/p>\n
A cautious recovery<\/h3>\n The first half of the year was tough with the Four Horsemen of the Apocalypse making their presence felt. Global instability, including the Trump effect, shook market confidence and dampened activity. But there are green shoots. In the past month or so, developer activity has begun to pick up again.<\/p>\n
One of the big drivers is the revised standard method. Several local authorities now face dramatically higher housing targets, some which have seen a 400% increase, largely due to affordability adjustments. That\u2019s good news for developers already working in those areas. But land acquisition is still cautious. There\u2019s optimism, but it\u2019s cautious optimism.<\/p>\n
Local authorities: can they keep up with reform?<\/h3>\n Policy reform is one thing and delivery is another. Under-resourced planning departments are the silent challenge. No matter how progressive the policy is, it won\u2019t work without the people and systems to deliver it.<\/p>\n
The ambition is clear, and the building blocks are being put in place. But planning departments are stretched. Chronic underfunding, staff churn and limited capacity mean that even the best-intentioned reforms risk faltering at ground level.<\/p>\n
It\u2019s not always policy that delays applications; it\u2019s the lack of officers to move things forward. And while there\u2019s been a lot of talk about high-level reform, there\u2019s been far less visibility around structural support for local planning authorities. Reform in principle only works if it\u2019s backed by execution in practice. Without real investment in local capacity, even the most forward-thinking framework risks stalling.<\/p>\n
Small developers: still on the sidelines?<\/h3>\n SMEs currently remain at a disadvantage. While large housebuilders can weather delays and fund legal support, smaller firms often can\u2019t. Tight margins and cashflow pressures make them more vulnerable to a system that still feels costly and complex.<\/p>\n
The revised housing targets and standard methodology could open new doors, but that doesn\u2019t mean smaller developers are better equipped to walk through them. Reducing red tape and clarifying the NPPF would help. So would faster planning decisions and a more digitised system. But again, all of this depends on whether local authorities have the tools and people to deliver.<\/p>\n
SMEs are also more exposed to additional \u201ccost\u201d burdens. BNG, Section 106 agreements<\/a> and, where it has been introduced, the Community Infrastructure Levy, all add up. If the system remains complex and frontloaded with costs, smaller players will continue to struggle.<\/p>\nOne year in: is it enough?<\/h3>\n The ambition is welcome and it\u2019s refreshing to see a government trying to overhaul the system rather than tweak around the edges. But more could have been done earlier, particularly around consultation on the Planning and Infrastructure Bill.<\/p>\n
The real test will be whether Labour can convert ambition into delivery. That means homes built, not just policies published. The danger is being judged too soon, or solely by numbers. Planning reform is complicated, and one year is a relative drop in the ocean.<\/p>\n
Labour\u2019s success depends on staying the course and maintaining consistency. This can\u2019t be another cycle of change for change\u2019s sake. The foundations are in place but what\u2019s needed now is follow-through.<\/p>\n
The point is: vision is welcome. But now comes the hard part – making it real. In the words of Horace: \u201cDum loquimur, fugerit invida aetas: carpe diem, quam minimum credula postero.\u201d<\/p>\n
\n<\/div>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Ben Arrowsmith, head of planning at national law firm Roythornes Solicitors, reviews the good and the bad of Labour\u2019s first year in parliament.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":32,"featured_media":151938,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"_monsterinsights_skip_tracking":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_active":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_note":"","_monsterinsights_sitenote_category":0,"footnotes":""},"categories":[304],"tags":[164723,276,572],"stakeholder_rel_tag":[],"contributor_rel_tag":[],"class_list":{"0":"post-151932","1":"post","2":"type-post","3":"status-publish","4":"format-standard","5":"has-post-thumbnail","7":"category-planning-construction-news","8":"tag-biodiversity-net-gain","9":"tag-government","10":"tag-housebuilding"},"acf":[],"yoast_head":"\n
Labour's first year review: Building the future or falling short?<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Ben Arrowsmith, head of planning at national law firm Roythornes Solicitors, reviews the good and the bad of Labour\u2019s first year in parliament\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.pbctoday.co.uk\/news\/planning-construction-news\/labour-one-year-review-building-the-future-or-falling-short\/151932\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Labour's first year review: Building the future or falling short?\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Ben Arrowsmith, head of planning at national law firm Roythornes Solicitors, reviews the good and the bad of Labour\u2019s first year in parliament\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.pbctoday.co.uk\/news\/planning-construction-news\/labour-one-year-review-building-the-future-or-falling-short\/151932\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Planning, Building & Construction Today\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/PBCToday\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2025-06-04T08:52:31+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.pbctoday.co.uk\/news\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/06\/iStock-1453664452-1024x913.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1024\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"913\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Matt Brundrett\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@PBC_Today\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@PBC_Today\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.pbctoday.co.uk\/news\/planning-construction-news\/labour-one-year-review-building-the-future-or-falling-short\/151932\/#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.pbctoday.co.uk\/news\/planning-construction-news\/labour-one-year-review-building-the-future-or-falling-short\/151932\/\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Matt Brundrett\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.pbctoday.co.uk\/news\/#\/schema\/person\/594ba5cf5982e9dea55db60cc67201c3\"},\"headline\":\"Labour’s first year review: Building the future or falling short?\",\"datePublished\":\"2025-06-04T08:52:31+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.pbctoday.co.uk\/news\/planning-construction-news\/labour-one-year-review-building-the-future-or-falling-short\/151932\/\"},\"wordCount\":2121,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.pbctoday.co.uk\/news\/#organization\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.pbctoday.co.uk\/news\/planning-construction-news\/labour-one-year-review-building-the-future-or-falling-short\/151932\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.pbctoday.co.uk\/news\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/06\/iStock-1453664452.jpg\",\"keywords\":[\"Biodiversity Net Gain\",\"Government Policy\",\"Housebuilding\"],\"articleSection\":[\"Planning & Construction News\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.pbctoday.co.uk\/news\/planning-construction-news\/labour-one-year-review-building-the-future-or-falling-short\/151932\/#respond\"]}],\"copyrightYear\":\"2025\",\"copyrightHolder\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.pbctoday.co.uk\/news\/#organization\"}},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.pbctoday.co.uk\/news\/planning-construction-news\/labour-one-year-review-building-the-future-or-falling-short\/151932\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.pbctoday.co.uk\/news\/planning-construction-news\/labour-one-year-review-building-the-future-or-falling-short\/151932\/\",\"name\":\"Labour's first year review: Building the future or falling short?\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.pbctoday.co.uk\/news\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.pbctoday.co.uk\/news\/planning-construction-news\/labour-one-year-review-building-the-future-or-falling-short\/151932\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.pbctoday.co.uk\/news\/planning-construction-news\/labour-one-year-review-building-the-future-or-falling-short\/151932\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.pbctoday.co.uk\/news\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/06\/iStock-1453664452.jpg\",\"datePublished\":\"2025-06-04T08:52:31+00:00\",\"description\":\"Ben Arrowsmith, head of planning at national law firm Roythornes Solicitors, reviews the good and the bad of Labour\u2019s first year in parliament\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.pbctoday.co.uk\/news\/planning-construction-news\/labour-one-year-review-building-the-future-or-falling-short\/151932\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.pbctoday.co.uk\/news\/planning-construction-news\/labour-one-year-review-building-the-future-or-falling-short\/151932\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.pbctoday.co.uk\/news\/planning-construction-news\/labour-one-year-review-building-the-future-or-falling-short\/151932\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.pbctoday.co.uk\/news\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/06\/iStock-1453664452.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.pbctoday.co.uk\/news\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/06\/iStock-1453664452.jpg\",\"width\":1833,\"height\":1635,\"caption\":\"\u00a9iStock | 2020 Aviation\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.pbctoday.co.uk\/news\/planning-construction-news\/labour-one-year-review-building-the-future-or-falling-short\/151932\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.pbctoday.co.uk\/news\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Labour’s first year review: Building the future or falling short?\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.pbctoday.co.uk\/news\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.pbctoday.co.uk\/news\/\",\"name\":\"Planning, Building & Construction Today\",\"description\":\"The Latest Planning, Building & Construction News\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.pbctoday.co.uk\/news\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.pbctoday.co.uk\/news\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.pbctoday.co.uk\/news\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Planning, Building & Construction Today\",\"alternateName\":\"PBC Today\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.pbctoday.co.uk\/news\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.pbctoday.co.uk\/news\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.pbctoday.co.uk\/news\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/01\/pbctoday-logo-yoast-seo-organisation-1920-1080-001.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.pbctoday.co.uk\/news\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/01\/pbctoday-logo-yoast-seo-organisation-1920-1080-001.jpg\",\"width\":1920,\"height\":1080,\"caption\":\"Planning, Building & Construction Today\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.pbctoday.co.uk\/news\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/PBCToday\/\",\"https:\/\/x.com\/PBC_Today\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.pbctoday.co.uk\/news\/#\/schema\/person\/594ba5cf5982e9dea55db60cc67201c3\",\"name\":\"Matt Brundrett\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.pbctoday.co.uk\/news\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/988ad917057a66900e50efa03ae6e49ec25b0b95febda9277235cc945c2ff8ec?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/988ad917057a66900e50efa03ae6e49ec25b0b95febda9277235cc945c2ff8ec?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Matt Brundrett\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\/\/www.pbctoday.co.uk\"],\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.pbctoday.co.uk\/news\/author\/mattbrundrett\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Labour's first year review: Building the future or falling short?","description":"Ben Arrowsmith, head of planning at national law firm Roythornes Solicitors, reviews the good and the bad of Labour\u2019s first year in parliament","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.pbctoday.co.uk\/news\/planning-construction-news\/labour-one-year-review-building-the-future-or-falling-short\/151932\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Labour's first year review: Building the future or falling short?","og_description":"Ben Arrowsmith, head of planning at national law firm Roythornes Solicitors, reviews the good and the bad of Labour\u2019s first year in parliament","og_url":"https:\/\/www.pbctoday.co.uk\/news\/planning-construction-news\/labour-one-year-review-building-the-future-or-falling-short\/151932\/","og_site_name":"Planning, Building & Construction Today","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/PBCToday\/","article_published_time":"2025-06-04T08:52:31+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1024,"height":913,"url":"https:\/\/www.pbctoday.co.uk\/news\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/06\/iStock-1453664452-1024x913.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Matt Brundrett","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@PBC_Today","twitter_site":"@PBC_Today","schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.pbctoday.co.uk\/news\/planning-construction-news\/labour-one-year-review-building-the-future-or-falling-short\/151932\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.pbctoday.co.uk\/news\/planning-construction-news\/labour-one-year-review-building-the-future-or-falling-short\/151932\/"},"author":{"name":"Matt Brundrett","@id":"https:\/\/www.pbctoday.co.uk\/news\/#\/schema\/person\/594ba5cf5982e9dea55db60cc67201c3"},"headline":"Labour’s first year review: Building the future or falling short?","datePublished":"2025-06-04T08:52:31+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.pbctoday.co.uk\/news\/planning-construction-news\/labour-one-year-review-building-the-future-or-falling-short\/151932\/"},"wordCount":2121,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.pbctoday.co.uk\/news\/#organization"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.pbctoday.co.uk\/news\/planning-construction-news\/labour-one-year-review-building-the-future-or-falling-short\/151932\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.pbctoday.co.uk\/news\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/06\/iStock-1453664452.jpg","keywords":["Biodiversity Net Gain","Government Policy","Housebuilding"],"articleSection":["Planning & Construction News"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.pbctoday.co.uk\/news\/planning-construction-news\/labour-one-year-review-building-the-future-or-falling-short\/151932\/#respond"]}],"copyrightYear":"2025","copyrightHolder":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.pbctoday.co.uk\/news\/#organization"}},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.pbctoday.co.uk\/news\/planning-construction-news\/labour-one-year-review-building-the-future-or-falling-short\/151932\/","url":"https:\/\/www.pbctoday.co.uk\/news\/planning-construction-news\/labour-one-year-review-building-the-future-or-falling-short\/151932\/","name":"Labour's first year review: Building the future or falling short?","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.pbctoday.co.uk\/news\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.pbctoday.co.uk\/news\/planning-construction-news\/labour-one-year-review-building-the-future-or-falling-short\/151932\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.pbctoday.co.uk\/news\/planning-construction-news\/labour-one-year-review-building-the-future-or-falling-short\/151932\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.pbctoday.co.uk\/news\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/06\/iStock-1453664452.jpg","datePublished":"2025-06-04T08:52:31+00:00","description":"Ben Arrowsmith, head of planning at national law firm Roythornes Solicitors, reviews the good and the bad of Labour\u2019s first year in parliament","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.pbctoday.co.uk\/news\/planning-construction-news\/labour-one-year-review-building-the-future-or-falling-short\/151932\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.pbctoday.co.uk\/news\/planning-construction-news\/labour-one-year-review-building-the-future-or-falling-short\/151932\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.pbctoday.co.uk\/news\/planning-construction-news\/labour-one-year-review-building-the-future-or-falling-short\/151932\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.pbctoday.co.uk\/news\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/06\/iStock-1453664452.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.pbctoday.co.uk\/news\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/06\/iStock-1453664452.jpg","width":1833,"height":1635,"caption":"\u00a9iStock | 2020 Aviation"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.pbctoday.co.uk\/news\/planning-construction-news\/labour-one-year-review-building-the-future-or-falling-short\/151932\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.pbctoday.co.uk\/news\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Labour’s first year review: Building the future or falling short?"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.pbctoday.co.uk\/news\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.pbctoday.co.uk\/news\/","name":"Planning, Building & Construction Today","description":"The Latest Planning, Building & Construction News","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.pbctoday.co.uk\/news\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.pbctoday.co.uk\/news\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.pbctoday.co.uk\/news\/#organization","name":"Planning, Building & Construction Today","alternateName":"PBC Today","url":"https:\/\/www.pbctoday.co.uk\/news\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.pbctoday.co.uk\/news\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.pbctoday.co.uk\/news\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/01\/pbctoday-logo-yoast-seo-organisation-1920-1080-001.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.pbctoday.co.uk\/news\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/01\/pbctoday-logo-yoast-seo-organisation-1920-1080-001.jpg","width":1920,"height":1080,"caption":"Planning, Building & Construction Today"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.pbctoday.co.uk\/news\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/PBCToday\/","https:\/\/x.com\/PBC_Today"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.pbctoday.co.uk\/news\/#\/schema\/person\/594ba5cf5982e9dea55db60cc67201c3","name":"Matt Brundrett","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.pbctoday.co.uk\/news\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/988ad917057a66900e50efa03ae6e49ec25b0b95febda9277235cc945c2ff8ec?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/988ad917057a66900e50efa03ae6e49ec25b0b95febda9277235cc945c2ff8ec?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Matt Brundrett"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.pbctoday.co.uk"],"url":"https:\/\/www.pbctoday.co.uk\/news\/author\/mattbrundrett\/"}]}},"publishpress_future_action":{"enabled":false,"date":"2026-09-22 23:48:53","action":"change-status","newStatus":"draft","terms":[],"taxonomy":"category","extraData":[]},"publishpress_future_workflow_manual_trigger":{"enabledWorkflows":[]},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.pbctoday.co.uk\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/151932","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.pbctoday.co.uk\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.pbctoday.co.uk\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.pbctoday.co.uk\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/32"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.pbctoday.co.uk\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=151932"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.pbctoday.co.uk\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/151932\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.pbctoday.co.uk\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/151938"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.pbctoday.co.uk\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=151932"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.pbctoday.co.uk\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=151932"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.pbctoday.co.uk\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=151932"},{"taxonomy":"stakeholder_rel_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.pbctoday.co.uk\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/stakeholder_rel_tag?post=151932"},{"taxonomy":"contributor_rel_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.pbctoday.co.uk\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/contributor_rel_tag?post=151932"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}
![\"Map](\"https:\/\/www.pbctoday.co.uk\/news\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/06\/Screenshot-2025-06-04-092102.png\")
![\"Chart](\"https:\/\/www.pbctoday.co.uk\/news\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/06\/Screenshot-2025-06-04-092727.png\")