{"id":159555,"date":"2026-02-19T12:45:01","date_gmt":"2026-02-19T12:45:01","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.pbctoday.co.uk\/news\/?p=159555"},"modified":"2026-02-19T12:45:01","modified_gmt":"2026-02-19T12:45:01","slug":"editors-view-reform-uks-construction-agenda-policy-shift-or-political-rhetoric","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.pbctoday.co.uk\/news\/planning-construction-news\/editors-view-reform-uks-construction-agenda-policy-shift-or-political-rhetoric\/159555\/","title":{"rendered":"Editor\u2019s view: Reform UK\u2019s construction agenda \u2013 Policy shift or political rhetoric?"},"content":{"rendered":"

On the heels of a Reform UK press conference this week, PBC Today digital editor Matt Brundrett investigates what a hypothetical Reform UK government could mean for the construction industry<\/h2>\n

Nigel Farage and other party members, including rejected Tory candidate and party-quitter<\/a> Zia Yusuf, and Tory defector Suella Braverman, held a press conference on Tuesday, 17 February, perhaps in an attempt to reverse the widely reported<\/a>\u00a0drop in popularity for the party, in which they fielded questions, including Reform UK’s construction policy.<\/p>\n

It was a packed seven hours, with tiredly familiar talking points and typical Farage-style mudslinging and jeering, including insulting a reporter from the Financial Times (FT), Anna Gross, who asked about Reform\u2019s migration policy and the education of the politicians, to which Farage dismissively responded that she should \u201cjust write some silly story.\u201d<\/p>\n

Here, we\u2019ll look at what the party has previously said that would be of interest to the construction industry.<\/p>\n

Housing<\/h3>\n

During the conference, Farage announced that if Reform took power, they would establish a new Department of Business, Trade and Energy. This would be led by Richard Tice, the party’s deputy leader.<\/p>\n

Tice then spoke at the conference, in which he made it clear that the new department would work to \u2018create millions\u2019 for shareholders, reindustrialise the country, and create a sovereign wealth fund. He also somewhat off-handedly mentioned that the department would cover housing.<\/p>\n

Tice said: \u201cI\u2019m going to be talking this time next week in the Midlands in great detail about this, a sovereign wealth fund that backs British companies, that buys and promotes British products and that helps ensure that we build hundreds of thousands of affordable homes in our towns, our rural areas and our cities. This is how we make real progress.\u201d<\/p>\n

Tice failed to go into any detail about how a department dealing with business, trade, and energy would manage the construction of new housing, so we have no choice but to look elsewhere for their house-building policies.<\/p>\n

The Reform UK manifesto from the 2024 election cycle recognises that \u2018Britain has a housing crisis,\u2019 but provides very little detail on how it would be addressed. What little there is includes both reforming and reviewing the planning system. This would be achieved by using vague terms such as fast-tracking new housing on brownfield sites via tax incentives, and by creating a \u2018loose fit planning\u2019 policy for large residential developments. Again, only minor detail is given on how this would work, but with the benefit of the doubt, it sounds similar to what the current government has done, with investments into brownfield sites<\/a> and proposed brownfield passports<\/a>.<\/p>\n

The focus on brownfield, however, has been previously criticised, as highlighted by Central Bedfordshire Council, as they tackled the specific question of Why can\u2019t we build more on brownfield sites<\/em><\/a>:<\/p>\n

\u201cBrownfield land is land that has been previously developed or built on. This could include land that has been used for housing, industry or car parks, for example. We want to use as much brownfield land as we can. Unfortunately, the supply of brownfield land in Central Bedfordshire is very limited and, in the past, there hasn\u2019t been enough to deliver all the homes and jobs that are needed. This has meant that growth has had to be allocated to greenfield sites. We keep a register of known brownfield sites that we think could come forward for development, subject to planning permission, which is updated annually. We will always look to use this land before we look for greenfield sites.\u201d<\/p>\n

This suggests that providing tax reliefs for developers on brownfield sites is tackling the wrong aspect of the issue, as the real issue is availability and the appropriateness of the brownfield land for development. Under tax reliefs, while developers may pay less to acquire the land and go through planning, etc., they may still end up creating less housing at a higher cost due to remediation, preparation, and upkeep costs.<\/p>\n

The suggestion of a \u2018loose fit planning\u2019 policy sounds like it would remove red tape or bureaucracy that bogs projects down- an approach remarkably similar to the current government\u2019s measures in planning reforms and the National Planning Policy Framework, which has been criticised by Propertymark<\/a> as not being enough to achieve government targets for 1.5m new homes.<\/p>\n

In the Reform manifesto, Nigel Farage writes in the opening statement: \u201cThe unprecedented population explosion has pushed Britain to breaking point. There\u2019s a housing crisis. A benefits crisis. Record crime. Record NHS waiting lists. Wages are stagnating. Net Zero has sent energy costs soaring. It is making us poorer and colder, damaging British industry and forcing drivers off the road.\u201d<\/p>\n

Further in, the manifesto states a solution: \u201cAll non-essential immigration frozen to boost wages, protect public services, end the housing crisis and cut crime.\u201d<\/p>\n

And in the most on-the-nose statement of all: \u201cReform UK will ensure that people can own their own home by unleashing housebuilding across the country and cutting immigration.\u201d<\/p>\n

Along with the vague and unsupported solutions they do propose, Reform UK make it very clear that they continue their same old clich\u00e9 of blaming the lack of housebuilding and the housing crisis on immigration, with no context, evidence, or reasoning given.<\/p>\n

Therefore, until Richard Tice can go into more detail in the safety of his fellow Reform supporters and away from the scrutiny of journalists\u2019 questions, all we have been given, and presumably all Reform UK have as a housing policy, is the same thing they have for almost everything else: demonise immigrants.<\/p>\n

Editor\u2019s note:<\/strong> When introducing the new Department of Business, Trade and Energy, Farage said that it would be \u201ca new super economics and business department, in many ways modelled on what the Germans did after World War II.\u201d Those familiar with Reform UK\u2019s Euroscepticism will be interested to know that the rapid economic recovery of West Germany following the war is in large-part due to the success of the Marhall Plan, or the European Recovery Program, in which the US and Western Europe lent the country the equivalent of $19bn to promote economic recovery \u2013 a far cry from the home-made nature that Farage seems to imply.<\/em><\/p>\n

Infrastructure, industry, and net zero<\/h3>\n

Richard Tice continued on \u201cNet Stupid Zero,\u201d speaking about accessing Britain\u2019s \u201cenergy treasure\u201d in oil and gas. Again, he failed to elaborate on any points, but previously, Tice stated that if Reform UK took power, the Department for Energy Security and Net Zero (DESNZ) would be scrapped, along with net zero targets.<\/p>\n

Beyond this, last year, Tice stated that the renewable energy sector would also face taxes, called renewable energy \u201ca massive con,\u201d and said that subsidies for wind and solar companies would be \u201crecovered.\u201d<\/p>\n

The Reform UK manifesto echoes this line, with one of their key points stating: \u201cScrap energy levies and net zero to slash energy bills and save each household \u00a3500 per year. Unlock Britain\u2019s vast oil and gas reserves to beat the cost-of-living crisis and unleash real economic growth,\u201d and that scrapping net zero \u201ccould save the public sector over \u00a330bn per year for the next 25 years\u201d, of course, with no explanation as to how.<\/p>\n

As was highlighted in a previous Editor\u2019s View<\/a>, net zero is far from a lost cause, and will not cost the country nor the taxpayers much at all \u2013 in fact, the cost of both creating and maintaining a net zero energy system will only be \u00a3360bn more than simply maintaining the current energy system from now until 2050. Coupled with the rise in the cost of food, natural disasters, and other climate change-related costs, the cost of not achieving net zero will be far greater in the long run than creating net zero now.<\/p>\n

Of note is Reform UK\u2019s insistence on continuing to rely on the UK\u2019s own gas and oil reserves, referring to them as an \u201cenergy treasure.\u201d According to the North Sea Transition Authority, the body overseeing the oil and gas industry in the North Sea, there were 2.9bn Barrels of Oil Equivalent<\/a> (boe) at the end of 2024, down from the 3.3bn at the end of 2023, suggesting that exploration and discovery of new deposits is not enough to match the consumption, and suggests that from 2024 there was only enough in reserve to power around three years of gas and 15 years of oil. This is only in reserves, it should be noted, and not in resources, which tend to be much more plentiful.<\/p>\n

Regarding Tice\u2019s insistence on a UK \u2018energy treasure\u2019 in oil and gas, the Carbon Brief<\/a> ran a fact check sorting out the difference between reserves and resources and why 3-15 years of reserves does not mean the country is anywhere near running out.<\/p>\n

However, they go on to say that this does not mean we should not move away from them, especially to avoid warming the world by more than 2 degrees Celsius by 2050, a change that would have disastrous consequences. The UK currently generates 43% of its energy from renewable sources, meaning that even with nearly half of its energy coming from cheaper, reliable, renewable resources, the UK still had to dip into its oil and gas reserves, to the point that we used more than could be replenished.<\/p>\n

This is a trend that, as per the graph from the North Sea Transition Authority below, has been mostly consistent over the last 8 years and will likely continue. Relying further on oil and gas would only exacerbate this issue, with consequences ranging from energy shortages to climate disasters.<\/p>\n

\"Graph
Image: \u00a9North Sea Transition Authority<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n

Conclusion: A whole lot of nothing<\/h3>\n

Reform UK is currently reaching the end of a period of popularity, focusing on repetitive rhetoric around immigration, climate scepticism, and attacking other parties.<\/p>\n

To some, this may seem attractive, but simply looking under the bonnet reveals crumbling arguments based on flimsy or absent reasoning, simply saying something will bring something else as if it were true (reducing immigration will bring more housing), with neither any reasoning for why actioning the former causes the latter, nor how not addressing the former makes the latter any worse.<\/p>\n

For those in the construction industry looking for political parties with a plan for the industry, reasonable ideas or arguments that could boost housebuilding or address the skills shortage, they will want to steer clear of Reform UK.<\/p>\n

\n<\/div>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

On the back of their press conference, PBC Today editor Matt Brundrett investigates Reform UK’s construction agenda and its pros or cons.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":32,"featured_media":159558,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"_monsterinsights_skip_tracking":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_active":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_note":"","_monsterinsights_sitenote_category":0,"footnotes":""},"categories":[304],"tags":[173154,276,572,579],"stakeholder_rel_tag":[],"contributor_rel_tag":[],"class_list":{"0":"post-159555","1":"post","2":"type-post","3":"status-publish","4":"format-standard","5":"has-post-thumbnail","7":"category-planning-construction-news","8":"tag-exclusive","9":"tag-government","10":"tag-housebuilding","11":"tag-infrastructure"},"acf":[],"yoast_head":"\nEditor\u2019s view: Reform UK\u2019s construction agenda \u2013 Policy shift or political rhetoric?<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"On the back of their press conference, PBC Today editor Matt Brundrett investigates Reform UK's construction agenda and its pros or cons\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.pbctoday.co.uk\/news\/planning-construction-news\/editors-view-reform-uks-construction-agenda-policy-shift-or-political-rhetoric\/159555\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Editor\u2019s view: Reform UK\u2019s construction agenda \u2013 Policy shift or political rhetoric?\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"On the back of their press conference, PBC Today editor Matt Brundrett investigates Reform UK's construction agenda and its pros or cons\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.pbctoday.co.uk\/news\/planning-construction-news\/editors-view-reform-uks-construction-agenda-policy-shift-or-political-rhetoric\/159555\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Planning, Building & Construction Today\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/PBCToday\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2026-02-19T12:45:01+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.pbctoday.co.uk\/news\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/02\/iStock-2161353645-scaled.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"2048\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"1365\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Matt Brundrett\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@PBC_Today\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@PBC_Today\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.pbctoday.co.uk\/news\/planning-construction-news\/editors-view-reform-uks-construction-agenda-policy-shift-or-political-rhetoric\/159555\/#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.pbctoday.co.uk\/news\/planning-construction-news\/editors-view-reform-uks-construction-agenda-policy-shift-or-political-rhetoric\/159555\/\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Matt Brundrett\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.pbctoday.co.uk\/news\/#\/schema\/person\/594ba5cf5982e9dea55db60cc67201c3\"},\"headline\":\"Editor\u2019s view: Reform UK\u2019s construction agenda \u2013 Policy shift or political rhetoric?\",\"datePublished\":\"2026-02-19T12:45:01+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.pbctoday.co.uk\/news\/planning-construction-news\/editors-view-reform-uks-construction-agenda-policy-shift-or-political-rhetoric\/159555\/\"},\"wordCount\":1747,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.pbctoday.co.uk\/news\/#organization\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.pbctoday.co.uk\/news\/planning-construction-news\/editors-view-reform-uks-construction-agenda-policy-shift-or-political-rhetoric\/159555\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.pbctoday.co.uk\/news\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/02\/iStock-2161353645-scaled.jpg\",\"keywords\":[\"Exclusive\",\"Government Policy\",\"Housebuilding\",\"Infrastructure\"],\"articleSection\":[\"Planning & Construction News\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.pbctoday.co.uk\/news\/planning-construction-news\/editors-view-reform-uks-construction-agenda-policy-shift-or-political-rhetoric\/159555\/#respond\"]}],\"copyrightYear\":\"2026\",\"copyrightHolder\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.pbctoday.co.uk\/news\/#organization\"}},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.pbctoday.co.uk\/news\/planning-construction-news\/editors-view-reform-uks-construction-agenda-policy-shift-or-political-rhetoric\/159555\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.pbctoday.co.uk\/news\/planning-construction-news\/editors-view-reform-uks-construction-agenda-policy-shift-or-political-rhetoric\/159555\/\",\"name\":\"Editor\u2019s view: Reform UK\u2019s construction agenda \u2013 Policy shift or political rhetoric?\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.pbctoday.co.uk\/news\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.pbctoday.co.uk\/news\/planning-construction-news\/editors-view-reform-uks-construction-agenda-policy-shift-or-political-rhetoric\/159555\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.pbctoday.co.uk\/news\/planning-construction-news\/editors-view-reform-uks-construction-agenda-policy-shift-or-political-rhetoric\/159555\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.pbctoday.co.uk\/news\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/02\/iStock-2161353645-scaled.jpg\",\"datePublished\":\"2026-02-19T12:45:01+00:00\",\"description\":\"On the back of their press conference, PBC Today editor Matt Brundrett investigates Reform UK's construction agenda and its pros or cons\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.pbctoday.co.uk\/news\/planning-construction-news\/editors-view-reform-uks-construction-agenda-policy-shift-or-political-rhetoric\/159555\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.pbctoday.co.uk\/news\/planning-construction-news\/editors-view-reform-uks-construction-agenda-policy-shift-or-political-rhetoric\/159555\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.pbctoday.co.uk\/news\/planning-construction-news\/editors-view-reform-uks-construction-agenda-policy-shift-or-political-rhetoric\/159555\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.pbctoday.co.uk\/news\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/02\/iStock-2161353645-scaled.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.pbctoday.co.uk\/news\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/02\/iStock-2161353645-scaled.jpg\",\"width\":2048,\"height\":1365,\"caption\":\"Image: iStock | John_Lamb\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.pbctoday.co.uk\/news\/planning-construction-news\/editors-view-reform-uks-construction-agenda-policy-shift-or-political-rhetoric\/159555\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.pbctoday.co.uk\/news\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Editor\u2019s view: Reform UK\u2019s construction agenda \u2013 Policy shift or political rhetoric?\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.pbctoday.co.uk\/news\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.pbctoday.co.uk\/news\/\",\"name\":\"Planning, Building & Construction Today\",\"description\":\"The Latest Planning, Building & Construction News\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.pbctoday.co.uk\/news\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.pbctoday.co.uk\/news\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.pbctoday.co.uk\/news\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Planning, Building & Construction Today\",\"alternateName\":\"PBC Today\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.pbctoday.co.uk\/news\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.pbctoday.co.uk\/news\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.pbctoday.co.uk\/news\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/01\/pbctoday-logo-yoast-seo-organisation-1920-1080-001.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.pbctoday.co.uk\/news\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/01\/pbctoday-logo-yoast-seo-organisation-1920-1080-001.jpg\",\"width\":1920,\"height\":1080,\"caption\":\"Planning, Building & Construction Today\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.pbctoday.co.uk\/news\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/PBCToday\/\",\"https:\/\/x.com\/PBC_Today\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.pbctoday.co.uk\/news\/#\/schema\/person\/594ba5cf5982e9dea55db60cc67201c3\",\"name\":\"Matt Brundrett\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.pbctoday.co.uk\/news\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/988ad917057a66900e50efa03ae6e49ec25b0b95febda9277235cc945c2ff8ec?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/988ad917057a66900e50efa03ae6e49ec25b0b95febda9277235cc945c2ff8ec?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Matt Brundrett\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\/\/www.pbctoday.co.uk\"],\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.pbctoday.co.uk\/news\/author\/mattbrundrett\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Editor\u2019s view: Reform UK\u2019s construction agenda \u2013 Policy shift or political rhetoric?","description":"On the back of their press conference, PBC Today editor Matt Brundrett investigates Reform UK's construction agenda and its pros or cons","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.pbctoday.co.uk\/news\/planning-construction-news\/editors-view-reform-uks-construction-agenda-policy-shift-or-political-rhetoric\/159555\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Editor\u2019s view: Reform UK\u2019s construction agenda \u2013 Policy shift or political rhetoric?","og_description":"On the back of their press conference, PBC Today editor Matt Brundrett investigates Reform UK's construction agenda and its pros or cons","og_url":"https:\/\/www.pbctoday.co.uk\/news\/planning-construction-news\/editors-view-reform-uks-construction-agenda-policy-shift-or-political-rhetoric\/159555\/","og_site_name":"Planning, Building & Construction Today","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/PBCToday\/","article_published_time":"2026-02-19T12:45:01+00:00","og_image":[{"width":2048,"height":1365,"url":"https:\/\/www.pbctoday.co.uk\/news\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/02\/iStock-2161353645-scaled.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Matt Brundrett","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@PBC_Today","twitter_site":"@PBC_Today","schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.pbctoday.co.uk\/news\/planning-construction-news\/editors-view-reform-uks-construction-agenda-policy-shift-or-political-rhetoric\/159555\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.pbctoday.co.uk\/news\/planning-construction-news\/editors-view-reform-uks-construction-agenda-policy-shift-or-political-rhetoric\/159555\/"},"author":{"name":"Matt Brundrett","@id":"https:\/\/www.pbctoday.co.uk\/news\/#\/schema\/person\/594ba5cf5982e9dea55db60cc67201c3"},"headline":"Editor\u2019s view: Reform UK\u2019s construction agenda \u2013 Policy shift or political rhetoric?","datePublished":"2026-02-19T12:45:01+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.pbctoday.co.uk\/news\/planning-construction-news\/editors-view-reform-uks-construction-agenda-policy-shift-or-political-rhetoric\/159555\/"},"wordCount":1747,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.pbctoday.co.uk\/news\/#organization"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.pbctoday.co.uk\/news\/planning-construction-news\/editors-view-reform-uks-construction-agenda-policy-shift-or-political-rhetoric\/159555\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.pbctoday.co.uk\/news\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/02\/iStock-2161353645-scaled.jpg","keywords":["Exclusive","Government Policy","Housebuilding","Infrastructure"],"articleSection":["Planning & Construction News"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.pbctoday.co.uk\/news\/planning-construction-news\/editors-view-reform-uks-construction-agenda-policy-shift-or-political-rhetoric\/159555\/#respond"]}],"copyrightYear":"2026","copyrightHolder":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.pbctoday.co.uk\/news\/#organization"}},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.pbctoday.co.uk\/news\/planning-construction-news\/editors-view-reform-uks-construction-agenda-policy-shift-or-political-rhetoric\/159555\/","url":"https:\/\/www.pbctoday.co.uk\/news\/planning-construction-news\/editors-view-reform-uks-construction-agenda-policy-shift-or-political-rhetoric\/159555\/","name":"Editor\u2019s view: Reform UK\u2019s construction agenda \u2013 Policy shift or political rhetoric?","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.pbctoday.co.uk\/news\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.pbctoday.co.uk\/news\/planning-construction-news\/editors-view-reform-uks-construction-agenda-policy-shift-or-political-rhetoric\/159555\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.pbctoday.co.uk\/news\/planning-construction-news\/editors-view-reform-uks-construction-agenda-policy-shift-or-political-rhetoric\/159555\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.pbctoday.co.uk\/news\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/02\/iStock-2161353645-scaled.jpg","datePublished":"2026-02-19T12:45:01+00:00","description":"On the back of their press conference, PBC Today editor Matt Brundrett investigates Reform UK's construction agenda and its pros or cons","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.pbctoday.co.uk\/news\/planning-construction-news\/editors-view-reform-uks-construction-agenda-policy-shift-or-political-rhetoric\/159555\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.pbctoday.co.uk\/news\/planning-construction-news\/editors-view-reform-uks-construction-agenda-policy-shift-or-political-rhetoric\/159555\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.pbctoday.co.uk\/news\/planning-construction-news\/editors-view-reform-uks-construction-agenda-policy-shift-or-political-rhetoric\/159555\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.pbctoday.co.uk\/news\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/02\/iStock-2161353645-scaled.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.pbctoday.co.uk\/news\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/02\/iStock-2161353645-scaled.jpg","width":2048,"height":1365,"caption":"Image: iStock | John_Lamb"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.pbctoday.co.uk\/news\/planning-construction-news\/editors-view-reform-uks-construction-agenda-policy-shift-or-political-rhetoric\/159555\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.pbctoday.co.uk\/news\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Editor\u2019s view: Reform UK\u2019s construction agenda \u2013 Policy shift or political rhetoric?"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.pbctoday.co.uk\/news\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.pbctoday.co.uk\/news\/","name":"Planning, Building & Construction Today","description":"The Latest Planning, Building & Construction News","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.pbctoday.co.uk\/news\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.pbctoday.co.uk\/news\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.pbctoday.co.uk\/news\/#organization","name":"Planning, Building & Construction Today","alternateName":"PBC Today","url":"https:\/\/www.pbctoday.co.uk\/news\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.pbctoday.co.uk\/news\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.pbctoday.co.uk\/news\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/01\/pbctoday-logo-yoast-seo-organisation-1920-1080-001.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.pbctoday.co.uk\/news\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/01\/pbctoday-logo-yoast-seo-organisation-1920-1080-001.jpg","width":1920,"height":1080,"caption":"Planning, Building & Construction Today"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.pbctoday.co.uk\/news\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/PBCToday\/","https:\/\/x.com\/PBC_Today"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.pbctoday.co.uk\/news\/#\/schema\/person\/594ba5cf5982e9dea55db60cc67201c3","name":"Matt Brundrett","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.pbctoday.co.uk\/news\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/988ad917057a66900e50efa03ae6e49ec25b0b95febda9277235cc945c2ff8ec?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/988ad917057a66900e50efa03ae6e49ec25b0b95febda9277235cc945c2ff8ec?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Matt Brundrett"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.pbctoday.co.uk"],"url":"https:\/\/www.pbctoday.co.uk\/news\/author\/mattbrundrett\/"}]}},"publishpress_future_action":{"enabled":false,"date":"2026-09-29 10:38:13","action":"change-status","newStatus":"draft","terms":[],"taxonomy":"category","extraData":[]},"publishpress_future_workflow_manual_trigger":{"enabledWorkflows":[]},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.pbctoday.co.uk\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/159555","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.pbctoday.co.uk\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.pbctoday.co.uk\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.pbctoday.co.uk\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/32"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.pbctoday.co.uk\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=159555"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"https:\/\/www.pbctoday.co.uk\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/159555\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":159560,"href":"https:\/\/www.pbctoday.co.uk\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/159555\/revisions\/159560"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.pbctoday.co.uk\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/159558"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.pbctoday.co.uk\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=159555"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.pbctoday.co.uk\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=159555"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.pbctoday.co.uk\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=159555"},{"taxonomy":"stakeholder_rel_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.pbctoday.co.uk\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/stakeholder_rel_tag?post=159555"},{"taxonomy":"contributor_rel_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.pbctoday.co.uk\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/contributor_rel_tag?post=159555"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}