Bridges connect places and people and ensure the smooth transport of goods. Bridge construction and planning is complex – and urgently needs a digitalisation boost by relying on software solutions and digital tools, such as the ones from the Nemetschek Group

Bridges span valleys, rivers and traffic routes, and are also identity-creating symbols: they are, therefore an important part of our building culture.

It is not only the safety and load-bearing capacity of bridges that are relevant but also their design. There are creative approaches to designing the bridge form that address the forces in the structure in an architecturally exciting way. Bridges have always been a showcase for the art of engineering and are increasingly symbols of the future theme of sustainability, whether through the optimised use of materials or the use of renewable raw materials.

The overriding goal of bridge construction remains to improve transport logistics. The first bridges were built as early as the Neolithic Age. Today, bridges form the foundation of any modern transport infrastructure. The performance of the federal highway network in Germany, for example, is based on 39,500 bridges, with a total length of over 2,000 kilometres.

The planning and construction of long-span bridges is considered the “supreme discipline” in engineering: large components weighing several tonnes have to be manufactured, delivered and precisely fitted into the existing infrastructure on time. Experienced designers and structural engineers are needed, as well as good cooperation with construction
companies and authorities. That way, nothing can go wrong later on the construction site under diverse environmental influences.

The lack of digitalisation in bridge construction wastes time and productivity

However, the planning of bridges is often anything but collaborative at present: planning data comes from different data sources and in various formats from different participants so that the individual bridge models (geometric, static, structural and, if necessary, detailed models for the tension cables) do not match exactly. In some cases, multiple models are worked on in parallel by globally distributed teams. However, bridges are usually very complex structures. Any modification process is therefore extremely time-consuming.

Nevertheless, modifications as well as time-consuming synchronisations are part of the daily business in bridge construction. Possible inconsistencies and misinformation can run through all planning phases. The end result is then reflected in numerous challenges: the lack of collaboration delays planning and planning teams spend valuable time reworking and correcting mistakes – time they could already devote to new projects with modified, collaborative planning. In addition, inconsistent planning data can cause delays in the construction of a bridge – which, in turn, costs time, and money. And last but not least, postconstruction and reconstruction work wastes valuable building materials and unnecessarily emits a lot of CO2. To overcome these challenges, the planning and construction of bridges need a digital revolution – and an increase in the usage of digital tools.

@matho | Adobe Stock

A new way of planning for bridge construction

The challenge with bridges – and with their design and construction – lies in their structure: it is geometrically complex and the design must always be adapted to the alignment and the ground. With traditional 2D tools, planning changes had to be repeatedly updated manually in hundreds of drawings and calculations. This resulted in planning errors and inconsistencies that lead to delays and cost overruns on construction sites.

As a countermeasure, many industrialised countries made the use of BIM (Building Information Modelling, a partnership-based planning approach based on semantic 3D models) mandatory. However, there were initially no BIM-enabled design tools suitable for bridge construction.

It is time to usher in a new phase of bridge construction. This requires an end-to-end, model-based planning solution that does not rely on thinking in silos and two-dimensional plans but on collaboration and 3D models. This not only ensures quality, deadlines and cost targets are met but can also be used to reduce material consumption and thus lower CO2 emissions.

An optimal solution is therefore based on a common, detailed and fully parametric 4D model that not only represents the geometry of the bridge in 3D but also supplements it with the construction sequence and the structural analysis and verification.

Furthermore, it should combine all the information in such a way that changes to the planning model can also be implemented quickly, consistently and intuitively at any time. This means that multiple models or versions do not have to be created, calculations can be derived directly from the model and planning errors can thus be avoided.

Greater digitalisation would usher in a new age of bridge construction

Parametric design solutions are revolutionising bridge construction by relying on communication and collaboration instead of silo thinking and fragmentation. This not only enables cost savings but also a massive reduction in planning times. More projects can be completed in less time with the same number of employees. In view of the shortage of skilled workers, innovative IT solutions make an important contribution to accelerating the processing of the investment backlog in infrastructure construction.

The solution in bridge construction, not only in terms of construction methods or materials, lies in more digitalisation – in model-based, collaborative planning and in innovation. The
digital transformation of bridge planning is the key to a new kind of bridge construction.

*Please note: this is a commercial profile.

 

Desiree Goldstein

Manager Communication

Nemetschek Group

mediarelations@nemetschek.com

www.nemetschek.com

Twitter

LinkedIn

Facebook

Instagram

Editor's Picks

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here